A. If a buffer plan is denied, the applicant shall first request reconsideration by the Director.
Failure to request reconsideration within thirty (30) days shall be deemed a waiver of the appeal
process. Such request shall be in writing and shall state with specificity why the buffer plan has
been incorrectly denied. In reconsideration, the Director shall determine whether the code was
incorrectly interpreted in evaluating the buffer plan and shall also have the authority to grant
variances to the code if:
1. The development has had buffer(s) applied in conformance with previously issued requirements.
2. The development has slopes or special geological conditions, such as bluffs or rock
outcroppings, or existing structures, or the development will provide mitigation, in which
case the middle and outer zone widths may be reduced at some points so long as the average
width of the buffer throughout the development meets the minimum requirement and the stream
side zone is not reduced.
B. Appeals to the Board of Adjustment may be made by any person aggrieved or affected by any decision
of the Director of Water Pollution Control. Such appeal shall be made within a reasonable time as
provided by the rules of the Board by filing with the Director of Water Pollution Control a notice
of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The Director of Water Pollution Control to whom the appeal
is submitted shall forthwith transmit to the Board all the papers constituting the record of the
action appealed. An appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance of the action appealed from unless
the Director of Water Pollution Control, from whom the appeal is taken, certifies to the Board of
Adjustment that after the notice of appeal shall have been filed, a stay would cause immediate peril
to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by a restraining
order that may be granted by the Board of Adjustment or a court of jurisdiction on application and
notice to the Director of Water Pollution Control and due cause is shown.
C. The Board of Adjustment shall fix a time for the hearing of the appeal within thirty days
following its receipt, give public notice thereof by publication one time in a newspaper of
local circulation in Independence not less than five (5) and not more than fifteen (15) days
prior to the date of said hearing, and decide the same within a reasonable time. At the hearing,
any party may appear in person, by agent or by attorney.
D. The Board of Adjustment as created by the Charter of the City of Independence shall take action
only in reference to a specific development when it has determined that a Buffer Plan has been
incorrectly denied, or when it has determined that this Article has been incorrectly interpreted,
or when the appellant proves undue and unnecessary hardship due to a provision or provisions herein
contained as applied to a specific development. Upon determination of incorrect action by the
Director of Water Pollution Control or of undue or unnecessary hardship, the Board may issue a
variance signed by the chairman. A copy of the variance shall be sent to the Director of Water
Pollution Control, who shall approve the Buffer Plan, including the terms of the variance. In no
case shall the Board of Adjustment issue a variance reducing the required width of the stream buffer
to less than an average of eighty-five feet (85') or seventy-five percent (75%) of the total required
buffer on each side of the stream beginning at the stream bank. The stream side zone shall not be
reduced in width. The Board of Adjustment must make findings based on evidence presented to it in
each specific case that:
1. The property in question cannot yield a reasonable return if permitted to be used only
under the conditions allowed by the regulations in this Article; and
2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances.
E. For purposes of implementing the above rules, the Board shall, in making its determination
as to whether there are practical difficulties or particular hardships, take into consideration
the extent to which the following facts favorable to the applicant have been established by
1. The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the specific
property involved would result in a particular hardship upon the owner, as distinguished
from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out;
2. The conditions on which the petition for a variance is based would not be applicable,
generally, to other developments;
3. The purpose of the variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to make more money
out of theproperty;
4. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having
an interest in the property; and
5. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located.
F. The Board of Adjustment may impose such conditions and restrictions upon the development
benefited by a variance as may be necessary to comply with the standards set out in this section,
to reduce or minimize the injurious effect of such variance upon other property in the neighborhood,
and to better carry out the general intent of this Article.
Back to top
Conflict With Other Regulations
Where the standards and management requirements of this Article are in conflict with other laws,
regulations, and policies regarding streams, steep slopes, erodible soils, wetlands, floodplains,
timber harvesting, land disturbance activities, or other environmental protective measures, the
more restrictive shall apply. Nothing contained in this Article shall be taken to either increase,
decrease or alter the methods of calculating density under Chapter 14 of this City Code.
Back to Article 5 table
Back to top
A Clear Commitment to